{"id":13042,"date":"2026-01-18T22:32:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-18T22:32:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=13042"},"modified":"2026-01-18T22:33:15","modified_gmt":"2026-01-18T22:33:15","slug":"tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/collective-agreement-grouping-fixed-term-employment-must-not-be-a-career-barrier\/","title":{"rendered":"Collective agreement grouping: Fixed-term contracts must not be a career barrier"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Cologne Labour Court - Judgement of 17\/10\/2025 - Ref. 1 Ca 1133\/25<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tarifliche_Eingruppierung_Befristung_darf_kein_Karrierehemmnis_sein\"><\/span>Collective agreement grouping: Fixed-term contracts must not be a career barrier<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">Many employees only realise at a late stage that they have been paid too little for years. It is often not the pay grade that is at issue, but the <strong>Collective bargaining group level<\/strong> - and therefore the question of which periods of employment are actually recognised. The judgement of the <strong>Employment Court Cologne, 02.07.2014, Case No.: 14 Ga 65\/14<\/strong> of 17 October 2025 provides important clarity here and significantly strengthens the rights of employees on fixed-term contracts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">At the centre of the decision is a collective agreement cut-off date regulation that meant that previous fixed-term contracts were effectively treated as a \u201efresh start from scratch\u201c - with noticeable financial disadvantages for those affected.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Der_Ausgangspunkt_Gruppenstufen_im_Entgelttarifvertrag\"><\/span>The starting point: Group levels in the collective wage agreement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The plaintiff was employed by the defendant for many years, initially for a fixed term and later for an indefinite term. The collective wage agreement of D AG applied to the employment relationship. This provides for several group levels within a pay grade, the achievement of which is dependent on the <strong>Years of service in the pay group<\/strong> depends.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The collective agreement differentiated between employees who were already employed before the cut-off date of 30 June 2019 and those whose employment relationship was \u201enewly established\u201c after this date. For the latter, significantly longer step durations applied - even if they had previously worked for the same employer for a limited period of time.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Unbefristung_ist_kein_%E2%80%9ENeubeginn%E2%80%9C\"><\/span>Permanent employment is not a \u201enew start\u201c<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The defendant was of the opinion that the transition from a fixed-term to a permanent employment relationship was to be recognised as a <strong>New foundation<\/strong> is to be regarded as a \"higher grade\". Consequence: Application of the less favourable step durations and subsequent upgrading within the pay group.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">Although the Cologne Labour Court followed this view in its starting point, it withdrew its legal basis. The decisive factor was not the collective agreement definition alone, but its <strong>Compatibility with higher-ranking law<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Verstos_gegen_das_Benachteiligungsverbot_des_TzBfG\"><\/span>Violation of the prohibition of discrimination under the TzBfG<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The Chamber clarifies: The extension of step durations for previously fixed-term employees based on the cut-off date violates Section 4 (2) sentence 1 TzBfG. Fixed-term employees may not be treated less favourably than comparable permanent employees due to the fixed term - unless there is an objective reason.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">No such objective reason was recognisable here. The provision in the collective agreement meant that identical periods of employment were assessed differently. Previous years of employment were effectively \u201edevalued\u201c simply because the employment relationship was initially limited in time.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mittelbare_Diskriminierung_durch_Stichtagsregelungen\"><\/span>Indirect discrimination through cut-off date regulations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The court's criticism of the key date logic is particularly clear. The Chamber speaks of a <strong>indirect discrimination<\/strong>, because it is based on a seemingly neutral characteristic - the reference date - but in fact it is precisely fixed-term employees who are systematically disadvantaged.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">Employees with identical professional experience and the same job remained in lower group levels for longer and received lower pay. This contradicts the meaning and purpose of group levels, which are intended to honour increasing experience.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Konsequenz_Anwendung_der_gunstigeren_Stufenlaufzeiten\"><\/span>Consequence: Application of the more favourable step runtimes<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">As a legal consequence of the infringement, the court did not declare the entire tariff mechanism invalid. Instead, it clarified that <strong>only the more favourable step runtimes<\/strong> for employees prior to the reporting date.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">In concrete terms, this meant that the plaintiff was entitled to the group step earlier than the defendant had assumed. Only longer periods of incapacity for work due to illness, which can only be taken into account to a limited extent under the collective agreement, postponed the entitlement by a few months.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Nachzahlung_und_Verzinsung\"><\/span>Back payment and interest<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The labour court ordered the defendant to pay the outstanding remuneration from the correct date and to pay interest on the arrears. Although the plaintiff did not receive the full period claimed, she did receive a substantial part of the difference claimed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">At the same time, the decision shows that classification actions are an effective means of ensuring correct remuneration in the long term - even beyond the specific payment claim.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bedeutung_fur_die_Praxis\"><\/span>Significance for practice<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The judgement has considerable practical relevance:<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">- Fixed-term periods of previous employment may not be devalued under collective agreements.<br \/>\n- Cut-off date regulations are subject to strict abuse controls.<br \/>\n- Differentiations under collective agreements must be compatible with the TzBfG.<br \/>\n- Employees can still have their correct classification clarified years later.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The decision is particularly explosive in sectors with a high proportion of fixed-term contracts.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Fazit_Erfahrung_zahlt_%E2%80%93_unabhangig_von_der_Vertragsform\"><\/span>Conclusion: experience counts - regardless of the type of contract<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The Cologne Labour Court makes it clear: anyone who has worked for years brings experience with them - regardless of whether the employment contract was initially fixed-term or permanent. Collective agreements that devalue precisely this experience do not stand up to legal scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p class=\"isSelectedEnd\">The judgement is a strong signal for employees. For employers, it is a clear reminder to carry out collective bargaining groupings carefully and without discrimination.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ArbG Cologne: Collective bargaining cut-off date regulations must not disadvantage fixed-term employees. Periods of previous employment must be taken into account for group levels.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":13043,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,3646],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13042","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt","category-befristungen"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tarifliche Eingruppierung: Befristung darf kein Karrierehemmnis sein - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Arbeitsgericht K\u00f6ln st\u00e4rkt befristet Besch\u00e4ftigte: Tarifliche Stufenlaufzeiten d\u00fcrfen fr\u00fchere T\u00e4tigkeitsjahre nicht entwerten. Urteil zur Eingruppierung und Nachzahlung.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/collective-agreement-grouping-fixed-term-employment-must-not-be-a-career-barrier\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tarifliche Eingruppierung: Befristung darf kein Karrierehemmnis sein - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arbeitsgericht K\u00f6ln st\u00e4rkt befristet Besch\u00e4ftigte: Tarifliche Stufenlaufzeiten d\u00fcrfen fr\u00fchere T\u00e4tigkeitsjahre nicht entwerten. Urteil zur Eingruppierung und Nachzahlung.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/collective-agreement-grouping-fixed-term-employment-must-not-be-a-career-barrier\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-18T22:32:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-18T22:33:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe-1024x683.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Classification according to collective agreements: Fixed-term contracts must not be a career obstacle - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Tieben","description":"Cologne Labour Court strengthens fixed-term employees: collective agreement step durations must not devalue previous years of employment. Judgement on classification and back pay.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/collective-agreement-grouping-fixed-term-employment-must-not-be-a-career-barrier\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tarifliche Eingruppierung: Befristung darf kein Karrierehemmnis sein - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","og_description":"Arbeitsgericht K\u00f6ln st\u00e4rkt befristet Besch\u00e4ftigte: Tarifliche Stufenlaufzeiten d\u00fcrfen fr\u00fchere T\u00e4tigkeitsjahre nicht entwerten. Urteil zur Eingruppierung und Nachzahlung.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/collective-agreement-grouping-fixed-term-employment-must-not-be-a-career-barrier\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2026-01-18T22:32:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-18T22:33:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe-1024x683.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Tarifliche Eingruppierung: Befristung darf kein Karrierehemmnis sein","datePublished":"2026-01-18T22:32:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-18T22:33:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/"},"wordCount":740,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe.png","articleSection":["Arbeitsrecht","Befristungen"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/","name":"Classification according to collective agreements: Fixed-term contracts must not be a career obstacle - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Tieben","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe.png","datePublished":"2026-01-18T22:32:15+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-18T22:33:15+00:00","description":"Cologne Labour Court strengthens fixed-term employees: collective agreement step durations must not devalue previous years of employment. Judgement on classification and back pay.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Entgeltgruppenstufe.png","width":1536,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/tarifliche-eingruppierung-befristung-darf-kein-karrierehemmnis-sein\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbeitsrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Tarifliche Eingruppierung: Befristung darf kein Karrierehemmnis sein"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13042"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13042\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13044,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13042\/revisions\/13044"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13042"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}