{"id":2931,"date":"2013-04-21T14:09:56","date_gmt":"2013-04-21T14:09:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=2931"},"modified":"2025-10-28T07:19:39","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T07:19:39","slug":"steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/criminal-tax-law-in-the-case-of-large-scale-tax-evasion-a-suspended-sentence-can-only-be-considered-if-there-are-important-reasons-for-mitigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Criminal tax law: In the case of large-scale tax evasion, a suspended sentence can only be considered if there are important reasons for mitigation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Federal Court of Justice, 07.02.2012, Ref.: 1 StR 525\/11<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Taxpayers in Germany form a community of solidarity. In order to ensure a fair and equal distribution of the tax burden in Germany, it is necessary for all taxpayers in Germany to be taxed according to their ability to pay (ability-to-pay principle).<\/p>\n<p>The protection of the timely and complete collection of the taxes to be levied, but also the protection of the assets of the honest tax debtor, is guaranteed in Germany by criminal tax law and the law on tax offences.<\/p>\n<p>After all, tax offences always result in damage to the assets of honest taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>Criminal tax law and the law on tax offences are regulated in Part 8 of the German Fiscal Code (AO). Part 8 of the AO in turn consists of four sections:<\/p>\n<p>1. substantive criminal provisions (Sections 369 to 376 AO)<\/p>\n<p>2. substantive provisions on fines (Sections 377 to 384 AO)<\/p>\n<p>3. criminal proceedings (\u00a7\u00a7 385 to 408 AO)<\/p>\n<p>4. fine proceedings (\u00a7\u00a7 409 to 412 AO).<\/p>\n<p>All tax offences can therefore be divided into criminal tax offences (Section 369 I AO) and administrative tax offences (Section 377 I AO).<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Tax offences<\/span> are among others:<\/p>\n<p>- Tax evasion (\u00a7 370 AO)<\/p>\n<p>- Commercial or gang-related damage to VAT revenue (Section 26c UStG)<\/p>\n<p>- Tax evasion<\/p>\n<p>- Breach of ban (\u00a7\u00a7 369 I No. 2, 372 AO)<\/p>\n<p>- Falsification of tax stamps (\u00a7 369 I No. 3 AO in conjunction with \u00a7\u00a7 148 ff. StGB)<\/p>\n<p>- Favouring a tax offender (\u00a7 369 I No. 4 AO in conjunction with \u00a7 257 StGB)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Fiscal offences<\/span> are among others:<\/p>\n<p>- Reckless tax evasion (\u00a7 378 AO)<\/p>\n<p>- Tax hazards (\u00a7\u00a7 379 - 383 AO)<\/p>\n<p>- Unauthorised acquisition of tax refund and compensation claims (Section 383 AO)<\/p>\n<p>- Damage to VAT revenue (\u00a7 26b UStG)<\/p>\n<p>Sentencing in criminal tax law is based on the guilt of the offender.<\/p>\n<p>This is therefore an individual process that must be examined on a case-by-case basis. All circumstances that speak in favour of and against the offender are weighed against each other.<\/p>\n<p>The law specifies certain circumstances that must be taken into account when weighing up the circumstances (Section 46 (2) StGB):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the motives and goals of the perpetrator,<\/li>\n<li>the attitude that speaks from the deed and the will expended in the deed,<\/li>\n<li>the extent of the breach of duty,<\/li>\n<li>the manner of execution and the culpable consequences of the offence,<\/li>\n<li>the offender's background, personal and financial circumstances and<\/li>\n<li>behaviour after the offence, in particular the offender's efforts to make amends for the damage and the offender's efforts to reach a settlement with the injured party.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In the above-mentioned ruling by the Federal Court of Justice on 7 February 2012, it confirmed its principles according to which a suspended sentence for tax evasion amounting to millions can only be considered if there are particularly weighty reasons for mitigation.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hintergrund_des_Falls\"><\/span>Case Background<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In 2001, the defendant was a co-partner and managing director of P. GmbH. He sold P. GmbH and another company to T. AG for DM 80 million. In addition, he received shares worth DM 7.2 million in return for facilitating the purchase of the other company shares. The defendant falsely declared these shares as part of the purchase price in his income tax return. This allowed him to take advantage of the favourable tax treatment under the half-income method, which resulted in a tax evasion of more than 890,000 euros for 2002.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Weitere_Steuerhinterziehung_durch_falsche_Deklaration_von_Tantiemen\"><\/span>Further tax evasion through false declaration of royalties<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>After the sale, the defendant remained active as managing director of P. GmbH. In 2006, he was entitled to royalties totalling more than 570,000 euros. In order to evade the income tax due, he arranged for the royalties to be allegedly gifted to his wife and children. He created false documents to conceal this \"gift\". This led to a tax evasion totalling 240,000 euros.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Verurteilung_durch_das_Landgericht_Augsburg\"><\/span>Conviction by the Augsburg Regional Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>On 8 April 2011, the Augsburg Regional Court sentenced the defendant to a total prison sentence of two years, suspended on probation, for tax evasion in two cases. In both cases, the court recognised a particularly serious case of tax evasion in accordance with Section 370 (1), (3) sentence 2 no. 1 AO. Despite this finding, a suspended sentence was imposed, which was attributed to mitigating circumstances.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Entscheidung_des_Bundesgerichtshofs_BGH\"><\/span>2. Decision of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH)<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) overturned the judgement of the regional court in the sentencing decision. The public prosecutor's appeal sought a higher sentence. The Federal Court of Justice saw considerable errors of law in the sentencing of the district court, which had worked in favour of the defendant. In particular, the lack of aggravating circumstances was taken into account as a mitigating factor and significant aggravating factors, such as the defendant's collaboration with his tax advisor to prepare manipulated documents, were not sufficiently taken into account.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, the regional court had orientated itself too strongly towards the possibility of a suspended sentence when determining the sentence. The BGH clarified that in the case of tax evasion totalling millions, a suspended sentence can only be considered if there are particularly weighty grounds for mitigation. However, the regional court had not sufficiently justified these, which is why the case was referred back to another criminal division of the regional court for a new hearing and decision.<\/p>\n<p>Source: Federal Court of Justice<\/p>\n<p><b>Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/b> Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.<\/p>\n<p>If you need legal advice, feel free to call us at 0221 \u2013 80187670 or email us at info@mth-partner.de.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Federal Court of Justice has set fixed limits for when a tax offender may not be given a suspended sentence. This limit depends in particular on the amount of tax evaded.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":12206,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[41],"tags":[2417,2410,2423],"class_list":["post-2931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-steuerrecht-rechtsanwalt","tag-milderungsgruende-steuerhinterziehung","tag-steuerhinterziehung-strafzumessung","tag-strafzumessungsgesichtspunkte-steuerhinterziehung"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Steuerstrafrecht: Bei Steuerhinterziehung im gro\u00dfen Ausma\u00df kommt eine Bew\u00e4hrungsstrafe nur noch bei gewichtigen Milderungsgr\u00fcnden in Betracht<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bei der Srafzumessung im Steuerstrafrecht werden alle Umst\u00e4nde, die f\u00fcr und gegen den T\u00e4ter sprechen gegeneinander abgewogen.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/criminal-tax-law-in-the-case-of-large-scale-tax-evasion-a-suspended-sentence-can-only-be-considered-if-there-are-important-reasons-for-mitigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Steuerstrafrecht: Bei Steuerhinterziehung im gro\u00dfen Ausma\u00df kommt eine Bew\u00e4hrungsstrafe nur noch bei gewichtigen Milderungsgr\u00fcnden in Betracht\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bei der Srafzumessung im Steuerstrafrecht werden alle Umst\u00e4nde, die f\u00fcr und gegen den T\u00e4ter sprechen gegeneinander abgewogen.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/criminal-tax-law-in-the-case-of-large-scale-tax-evasion-a-suspended-sentence-can-only-be-considered-if-there-are-important-reasons-for-mitigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-04-21T14:09:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-28T07:19:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Criminal tax law: In the case of large-scale tax evasion, a suspended sentence can only be considered if there are important reasons for mitigation","description":"When sentencing in criminal tax law, all circumstances that speak for and against the offender are weighed against each other.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/criminal-tax-law-in-the-case-of-large-scale-tax-evasion-a-suspended-sentence-can-only-be-considered-if-there-are-important-reasons-for-mitigation\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Steuerstrafrecht: Bei Steuerhinterziehung im gro\u00dfen Ausma\u00df kommt eine Bew\u00e4hrungsstrafe nur noch bei gewichtigen Milderungsgr\u00fcnden in Betracht","og_description":"Bei der Srafzumessung im Steuerstrafrecht werden alle Umst\u00e4nde, die f\u00fcr und gegen den T\u00e4ter sprechen gegeneinander abgewogen.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/criminal-tax-law-in-the-case-of-large-scale-tax-evasion-a-suspended-sentence-can-only-be-considered-if-there-are-important-reasons-for-mitigation\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2013-04-21T14:09:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-28T07:19:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Steuerstrafrecht: Bei Steuerhinterziehung im gro\u00dfen Ausma\u00df kommt eine Bew\u00e4hrungsstrafe nur noch bei gewichtigen Milderungsgr\u00fcnden in Betracht","datePublished":"2013-04-21T14:09:56+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T07:19:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/"},"wordCount":868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg","keywords":["Milderungsgr\u00fcnde Steuerhinterziehung","Steuerhinterziehung strafzumessung","Strafzumessungsgesichtspunkte Steuerhinterziehung"],"articleSection":["Steuerrecht"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/","name":"Criminal tax law: In the case of large-scale tax evasion, a suspended sentence can only be considered if there are important reasons for mitigation","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg","datePublished":"2013-04-21T14:09:56+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-28T07:19:39+00:00","description":"When sentencing in criminal tax law, all circumstances that speak for and against the offender are weighed against each other.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-10-28-at-12.11.41.jpeg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Steuerrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/steuerstrafrecht-bei-steuerhinterziehung-im-grossen-ausmass-kommt-eine-bewaehrungsstrafe-nur-noch-bei-gewichtigen-milderungsgruenden-in-betracht\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Steuerrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/category\/steuerrecht-rechtsanwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Steuerstrafrecht: Bei Steuerhinterziehung im gro\u00dfen Ausma\u00df kommt eine Bew\u00e4hrungsstrafe nur noch bei gewichtigen Milderungsgr\u00fcnden in Betracht"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2931"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2931\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9671,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2931\/revisions\/9671"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}