{"id":4675,"date":"2015-07-20T09:54:59","date_gmt":"2015-07-20T09:54:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=4675"},"modified":"2025-12-09T18:41:21","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T18:41:21","slug":"arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-alcohol-related-incapacity-for-work-does-not-exclude-entitlement-to-continued-payment-of-remuneration\/","title":{"rendered":"Labour law: Incapacity for work due to alcohol addiction does not lead to the exclusion of entitlement to continued remuneration."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Federal Labour Court, 18.03.2015, Ref.: 10 AZR 99\/14<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to the Continued Remuneration Act (EFZG), an employee affected by illness is entitled to up to six weeks' continued payment of wages. After this period, the health insurance fund steps in.<\/p>\n<p>In principle, employees are entitled to this regardless of the cause of their illness. In certain cases, however, the entitlement may be excluded if the illness is self-inflicted (see Section 3 (1) sentence 1 EFZG).<\/p>\n<p>This is the case, for example, if a professional driver does not wear a seatbelt at work and becomes unfit for work as a result.<\/p>\n<p>In the judgement of the Federal Labour Court discussed here, the court had to decide whether an employee suffering from alcoholism was responsible for his incapacity to work due to alcohol intoxication after multiple inpatient withdrawals within the meaning of the Continued Remuneration Act.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sachverhalt\"><\/span>Facts<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In this case, a statutory health insurance fund brought an action against the employer of an alcoholic employee, Mr L. Mr L had been employed by the defendant employer since 2007 and had been unable to work several times due to his alcohol-related illness. On 23 November 2011, Mr L. was admitted to hospital with alcohol poisoning (4.9 per mille), whereupon he remained unable to work for over ten months. He had previously undergone two rehab programmes, but had repeatedly relapsed. In the period from 29 November 2011 to 30 December 2011, the health insurance fund paid Mr L sick pay in the amount of EUR 1,303.36 and demanded this sum back from the employer. The claimant argued that Mr L. was not at fault for his alcohol relapse, meaning that he was entitled to continued payment of his salary. The employer took a different view and attributed the relapse to the employee's fault.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Urteil_der_Vorinstanzen\"><\/span>Judgement of the lower courts<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Both the Labour Court and the Regional Labour Court upheld the health insurance company's claim. Neither court found sufficient evidence of fault on the part of the employee for his relapse. The defendant was ordered to pay the amount claimed. The employer then lodged an appeal with the Federal Labour Court (BAG) to have the decision reviewed.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Entscheidung_des_Bundesarbeitsgerichts\"><\/span>Decision of the Federal Labor Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Federal Labour Court confirmed the judgements of the lower courts and ruled that the defendant was obliged to pay. The employee's alcoholism was recognised as an illness. According to the current state of medical knowledge, alcohol addiction cannot be assumed to be the fault of the employee within the meaning of the law on continued remuneration. Even in the event of a relapse after therapy, it cannot automatically be concluded that the employee is at fault. Studies have shown an abstinence rate of 40 to 50 %, which means that relapses after treatment are not uncommon. In case of doubt, a medical expert opinion should be obtained to clarify the question of possible fault.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Schlussfolgerung\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In this specific case, a socio-medical report found that Mr L was not at fault for his relapse due to his chronic alcohol addiction and the resulting \"addictive pressure\". Therefore, there was no fault within the meaning of the Continued Remuneration Act. The decision of the Federal Labour Court thus strengthened the rights of alcohol-dependent employees by placing the burden of proof of fault for relapses on employers. The defendant had to pay the amount claimed.<\/p>\n<p>Source: Federal Labor Court<\/p>\n<p><strong>Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/strong> Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.<\/p>\n<p>If you need legal advice, feel free to call us at 0221 \u2013 80187670 or email us at info@mth-partner.de.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/services\/employment-and-labour-law\/\">Lawyers in Cologne advise and represent you in labour law.<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Incapacity for work is self-inflicted if the employee has breached the duty of care that a reasonable person would normally exercise in his or her own interest, i.e. if he or she has contracted the illness leading to the incapacity for work through incomprehensible, reckless behaviour or behaviour that is contrary to common decency in the legal sense. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11959,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3652],"tags":[2963],"class_list":["post-4675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-krankheit-entgeltfortzahlung","tag-wann-entfaellt-der-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruch"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Arbeitsrecht: Die alkoholsuchtbedingte Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit f\u00fchrt nicht zum Ausschluss des Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Der Anspruch auf Entgeltfortzahlung ist nur dann ausgeschlossen, wenn den Arbeitnehmer tats\u00e4chlich ein Verschulden an seiner Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit trifft\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-alcohol-related-incapacity-for-work-does-not-exclude-entitlement-to-continued-payment-of-remuneration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arbeitsrecht: Die alkoholsuchtbedingte Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit f\u00fchrt nicht zum Ausschluss des Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Der Anspruch auf Entgeltfortzahlung ist nur dann ausgeschlossen, wenn den Arbeitnehmer tats\u00e4chlich ein Verschulden an seiner Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit trifft\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-alcohol-related-incapacity-for-work-does-not-exclude-entitlement-to-continued-payment-of-remuneration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-07-20T09:54:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-09T18:41:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Labour law: Incapacity for work due to alcohol addiction does not lead to the exclusion of entitlement to continued remuneration.","description":"The entitlement to continued payment of remuneration is only excluded if the employee is actually at fault for their incapacity to work","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-alcohol-related-incapacity-for-work-does-not-exclude-entitlement-to-continued-payment-of-remuneration\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arbeitsrecht: Die alkoholsuchtbedingte Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit f\u00fchrt nicht zum Ausschluss des Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches.","og_description":"Der Anspruch auf Entgeltfortzahlung ist nur dann ausgeschlossen, wenn den Arbeitnehmer tats\u00e4chlich ein Verschulden an seiner Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit trifft","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-alcohol-related-incapacity-for-work-does-not-exclude-entitlement-to-continued-payment-of-remuneration\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2015-07-20T09:54:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-09T18:41:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Arbeitsrecht: Die alkoholsuchtbedingte Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit f\u00fchrt nicht zum Ausschluss des Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches.","datePublished":"2015-07-20T09:54:59+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T18:41:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/"},"wordCount":565,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg","keywords":["Wann entf\u00e4llt der Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruch?"],"articleSection":["Krankheit &amp; Entgeltfortzahlung"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/","name":"Labour law: Incapacity for work due to alcohol addiction does not lead to the exclusion of entitlement to continued remuneration.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg","datePublished":"2015-07-20T09:54:59+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-09T18:41:21+00:00","description":"The entitlement to continued payment of remuneration is only excluded if the employee is actually at fault for their incapacity to work","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht-1.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Arbeitsrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-die-alkoholsuchtbedingte-arbeitsunfaehigkeit-fuehrt-nicht-zum-ausschluss-des-entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbeitsrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Krankheit &amp; Entgeltfortzahlung","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/krankheit-entgeltfortzahlung\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Arbeitsrecht: Die alkoholsuchtbedingte Arbeitsunf\u00e4higkeit f\u00fchrt nicht zum Ausschluss des Entgeltfortzahlungsanspruches."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4675"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4675\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9417,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4675\/revisions\/9417"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}