{"id":4909,"date":"2016-06-30T11:24:40","date_gmt":"2016-06-30T11:24:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=4909"},"modified":"2025-10-27T13:44:16","modified_gmt":"2025-10-27T13:44:16","slug":"mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/tenancy-law-insulting-a-co-tenant-as-a-stupid-jerk-justifies-an-immediate-termination-of-the-lease\/","title":{"rendered":"Tenancy law: Insulting a co-tenant as a \u201estupid jerk\u201c justifies an immediate termination of the lease."},"content":{"rendered":"

Cologne Regional Court, April 15, 2016, Case No.: 10 S 139\/15<\/strong><\/p>\n

If a tenant insults the landlord or other co-tenants, this can lead to an immediate termination of the tenancy.<\/p>\n

It should be noted, however, that behaviour before and after the insult also plays a role in assessing whether an insult constitutes an offence. cancellation without notice<\/a> is justified. For example, if the tenant has already insulted or threatened you on several occasions and then insults you again, termination without notice is justified in most cases.<\/p>\n

However, if the tenant apologizes for their misconduct and it is only an isolated incident, an immediate termination might even be invalid. The same applies if the insulting tenant was previously provoked or insulted or threatened themselves.\"Rights<\/p>\n

The duration of the tenancy and the extent to which the tenancy was already burdened by other disputes are also relevant.<\/p>\n

In the present case, the tenant not only insulted others but also caused nighttime noise disturbances and littered other tenants\u2018 property.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Facts of the court case:<\/span><\/h2>\n

<\/span>Tenant terrorized other tenants (vacuuming, music, etc.)<\/span><\/h3>\n

The appellant in this case was a tenant of an apartment in Cologne. For over a year, she had disturbed the nighttime peace of the other tenants by banging on the floor, vacuuming, slamming doors, running the washing machine, and playing loud music from her apartment.<\/p>\n

She had also frequently littered the terrace below her apartment by throwing down garbage and insulted co-tenants by saying, \u201eAre you out of your mind?\u201c<\/p>\n

<\/span>Landlord finally terminates the tenant immediately due to insults<\/span><\/h3>\n

Because of this behavior, the landlord repeatedly warned the tenant. After she again littered a co-tenant\u2019s terrace by throwing down salad, dragged her suitcase loudly through the stairwell to the basement at 1:30 a.m., and called a co-tenant a \u201estupid jerk,\u201c the landlord declared an extraordinary immediate termination of the tenancy due to a sustained disturbance of the peace.<\/p>\n

The initially called district court then sentenced the tenant to vacate the premises. The appellant appealed this judgment to the Cologne Regional Court.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Judgment of the Cologne Regional Court:<\/span><\/h2>\n

<\/span>The appellate court confirms the judgment of the Cologne District Court<\/span><\/h3>\n

The Cologne Regional Court agreed with the district court\u2019s view and ruled that the district court rightly sentenced the defendant to vacate and surrender the disputed apartment.<\/p>\n

The tenancy between the parties was effectively terminated by the plaintiff\u2019s immediate termination on July 30, 2014, as there was a significant reason within the meaning of \u00a7 543 (1), 569 (2) BGB. Such a reason exists when one party seriously disturbs the peace, making it unreasonable to expect the terminating party to continue the tenancy until the notice period expires, considering all circumstances and balancing the interests of both parties.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Tenant guilty of disturbing the peace<\/span><\/h3>\n

The requirement for mutual consideration by users of living spaces and other rooms in a building is understood as peace (Palandt, BGB, 75th edition, 2016, \u00a7 569 Rz. 11 mwN). Each party must ensure that (other) tenants are not more than unavoidably affected when exercising their rights under the rental agreement (LG Munich, NJW-RR 2013, 14; Schmidt-Futterer, Blank, Tenancy Law, 12th edition, 2015, \u00a7 569 BGB, Rz. 19). For the sustainability of the disturbance assumed by \u00a7 569 (2) BGB, neither one-off nor isolated incidents usually suffice, but repeated impairments do (Schmidt-Futterer, Blank, aaO Rz. 22; LG Munich, NJW-RR 2013, 14). Moreover, these must represent a serious violation of the mutual consideration requirement (BGH, NJW 2015, 1239). Disturbances merely in the minor area and leading only to nuisances do not justify termination under \u00a7 569 (2) BGB (OLG D\u00fcsseldorf, GuT 2007, 438). Lastly, the sustained disturbance of the peace must result in it being unreasonable to continue the contract until the ordinary termination period expires, for which the perception of a reasonable objective third party is decisive. In the required balancing of the individual case\u2019s circumstances, especially the severity and impact of the disturbance, as well as the degree of fault, must be considered (Schmidt-Futterer, aaO, Rz. 23; M\u00f6ssner in: Herberger\/Martinek\/R\u00fc\u00dfmann et al., jurisPK-BGB, 7th ed. 2014, \u00a7 569 BGB, Rz. 75).<\/p>\n

Tenant called the neighbor a \u201estupid jerk\u201c<\/h3>\n

Using this standard, the requirements of \u00a7 569 (2) BGB are met. On July 23 or 24, 2014, the defendant dropped salad on her co-tenant\u2019s terrace from her window; she also dragged her suitcase through the stairwell to the basement, causing significant noise in the early morning hours of July 25, 2014, at around 1:30 a.m.; she called her neighbor a \u201estupid jerk.\u201c<\/p>\n

These behaviors, listed in the termination letter dated July 30, 2014, were a continuation of the defendant\u2019s previously repeatedly inappropriate \u2013 and repeatedly warned \u2013 behavior. From 2013 onwards, there were numerous nighttime disturbances in the form of banging on the floor, vacuuming, slamming doors, using the washing machine, and playing loud music from her apartment. The defendant had also repeatedly littered the terrace of the witness living below her by throwing down items such as bones, shards, earth, salad, feathers, and green waste.<\/p>\n

On the basis of the witness statements and the hearing of the defendant, the Cologne Regional Court assessed the incidents between 23 and 25 July 2015 listed in the letter of termination dated 30 July 2014 as a sustained disturbance of the peace within the meaning of Section 569 (2) BGB. Thus, the soiling of the terrace with lettuce on 23 or 24 July 2014 as well as the disturbance of the peace on 25 July 2014 at around 1:30 a.m. and the subsequent insult of witness X (\u201estupid bag\u201c) were avoidable disturbances of their co-tenant and thus disturbances of the peace of the house. These disturbances were also sustainable. This was because they were not isolated incidents, but rather a consistent continuation of the established previous disturbances by Witness X; the defendant had already exhibited comparable behaviour on several previous occasions and had been warned by the plaintiff. This applies in particular to the repeated nocturnal disturbances of the peace, in particular through loud music, and the repeated soiling of the terrace of Witness X. However, the insulting of the witness as a \u201estupid sack of shit\u201c was also not the first defamation by the defendant to his detriment, but was in line with the question a few months earlier as to whether he was \u201estill quite right in the head\u201c, which was also the subject of a Warning letter<\/a> had been.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Previous warnings give the termination particular weight<\/span><\/h3>\n

Although the breaches of duty listed in the warnings were used up as independent reasons for termination, this does not mean they no longer matter. Instead, the fact that the defendant was previously warned several times for similar breaches of contract gives the recent breaches of duty listed in the termination letter their weight. Given this background, they appear to be an unwavering continuation of the defendant\u2019s reckless behavior toward her co-tenants, particularly toward witness X. These disturbances are not only characterized by their frequency but also by their severity, thus displaying the characteristic of sustainability.<\/p>\n

The chamber also did not overlook that insults, as intentional criminal acts, are generally considered serious breaches of duty, but immediate termination is usually only justified for repeated or particularly serious insults due to the often only minor consequences of such misconduct (Schmidt-Futterer, aaO, \u00a7 569 Rz. 24; M\u00f6ssner in: Herberger\/Martinek\/R\u00fc\u00dfmann, aaO, \u00a7 569 BGB, Rz. 75, 93 mwN). However, in this case, the insult is accompanied by the nighttime disturbance, which is recognized as a serious breach of duty and a sustained disturbance of the peace if it occurs frequently \u2013 whether by slamming doors or playing loud music (see Palandt, aaO, \u00a7 569 Rz. 13 mwN).<\/p>\n

<\/span>A noisy house is no excuse for tenant terror<\/span><\/h3>\n

Therefore, contrary to the appeal\u2019s argument, it does not matter whether a house is particularly noisy; tenants must always adjust their behavior to the building\u2019s conditions (M\u00f6ssner in: Herberger\/Martinek\/R\u00fc\u00dfmann, aaO, \u00a7 569 BGB, Rz. 98 mwN). Considering that the defendant also repeatedly littered witness X\u2019s terrace, a breach of duty considered serious on its own, there would be no doubt about the sustainability of the disturbance of the peace caused by the defendant.<\/p>\n

Given this background, it would not be reasonable for the plaintiff to continue the contractual relationship with the defendant until the ordinary termination period expires. Even if one assumed that the littering of the terrace and the noise disturbance \u2013 in contrast to the intentional insult \u2013 occurred negligently, the frequency and severity of the breaches of duty caused by the defendant, as well as the resulting consequences, would make continuing the contract unreasonable.<\/p>\n

Conclusion: <\/strong>Conclusion: If a tenant disturbs the peace, immediate and consistent action is necessary. Warnings and, if necessary, immediate and alternatively timely terminations are the tools of choice.<\/p>\n

Source: Cologne Regional Court<\/strong><\/p>\n

Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/strong> Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, the complexity and constant change in the subject matter make it necessary to exclude liability and guarantees.<\/p>\n

If you need legal advice, feel free to contact us at 0221 \u2013 80187670 or send us an email at If you require legal advice, feel free to call us at 0221 \u2013 80187670 or send us an email at If you need employment law advice, feel free to call us at 0221 \u2013 80187670 or send an email to info@mth-partner.de... info@mth-partner.de<\/a><\/p>\n

Lawyers in Cologne provide advice and representation in tenancy law.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A gross insult justifies termination without notice. It is so serious that the landlord cannot reasonably be expected to continue the tenancy <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11961,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[43],"tags":[2943,3048],"class_list":["post-4909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mietrecht-rechtsanwalt","tag-fristlose-kuendigung-wegen-beleidigung","tag-vermieter-beleidigt-fristlose-kuendigung"],"yoast_head":"\nMietrecht: Die Beleidigung des Mitmieters als bl\u00f6der Sack rechtfertigt die fristlose K\u00fcndigung.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Beleidigungen und Bedrohungen von Mitmietern oder des Vermieters rechtfertigen in den meisten F\u00e4llen die fristlose K\u00fcndigung des Mietvertrages\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/tenancy-law-insulting-a-co-tenant-as-a-stupid-jerk-justifies-an-immediate-termination-of-the-lease\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mietrecht: Die Beleidigung des Mitmieters als bl\u00f6der Sack rechtfertigt die fristlose K\u00fcndigung.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Beleidigungen und Bedrohungen von Mitmietern oder des Vermieters rechtfertigen in den meisten F\u00e4llen die fristlose K\u00fcndigung des Mietvertrages\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/tenancy-law-insulting-a-co-tenant-as-a-stupid-jerk-justifies-an-immediate-termination-of-the-lease\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-06-30T11:24:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-10-27T13:44:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tenancy law: Insulting a co-tenant as a \u201estupid jerk\u201c justifies an immediate termination of the lease.","description":"Insults and threats from fellow tenants or the landlord justify cancellation of the tenancy agreement without notice in most cases","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/tenancy-law-insulting-a-co-tenant-as-a-stupid-jerk-justifies-an-immediate-termination-of-the-lease\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mietrecht: Die Beleidigung des Mitmieters als bl\u00f6der Sack rechtfertigt die fristlose K\u00fcndigung.","og_description":"Beleidigungen und Bedrohungen von Mitmietern oder des Vermieters rechtfertigen in den meisten F\u00e4llen die fristlose K\u00fcndigung des Mietvertrages","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/tenancy-law-insulting-a-co-tenant-as-a-stupid-jerk-justifies-an-immediate-termination-of-the-lease\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2016-06-30T11:24:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-10-27T13:44:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Mietrecht: Die Beleidigung des Mitmieters als bl\u00f6der Sack rechtfertigt die fristlose K\u00fcndigung.","datePublished":"2016-06-30T11:24:40+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-27T13:44:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/"},"wordCount":1608,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg","keywords":["fristlose K\u00fcndigung wegen Beleidigung","Vermieter beleidigt fristlose K\u00fcndigung"],"articleSection":["Zivilrecht"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/","name":"Tenancy law: Insulting a co-tenant as a \u201estupid jerk\u201c justifies an immediate termination of the lease.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg","datePublished":"2016-06-30T11:24:40+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-27T13:44:16+00:00","description":"Insults and threats from fellow tenants or the landlord justify cancellation of the tenancy agreement without notice in most cases","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Zivilrecht-1.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Zivilrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/mietrecht-die-beleidigung-des-mitmieters-als-bloeder-sack-rechtfertigt-die-fristlose-kuendigung\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Zivilrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/mietrecht-rechtsanwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Mietrecht: Die Beleidigung des Mitmieters als bl\u00f6der Sack rechtfertigt die fristlose K\u00fcndigung."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4909"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8610,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4909\/revisions\/8610"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11961"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}