{"id":5175,"date":"2025-11-29T09:30:37","date_gmt":"2025-11-29T09:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=5175"},"modified":"2025-11-29T16:15:33","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T16:15:33","slug":"auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-if-the-immigration-authority-remains-inactive-the-foreigner-must-be-naturalized-even-in-cases-of-deception\/","title":{"rendered":"Immigration Law: If the immigration authority remains inactive, the foreigner must be naturalized even in cases of deception."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Federal Administrative Court, June 1, 2017, Case No.: 1 C 16.16<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Section 10 of the Nationality Act (Entitlement to Naturalization) includes the following requirements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Five years of lawful permanent residence in Germany, which must generally be continuous.<\/li>\n<li>The applicant\u2019s commitment to the free and democratic constitutional order.<\/li>\n<li>The applicant must hold a right of residence (e.g., residence permit or settlement permit).<\/li>\n<li>The applicant must be able to support themselves and their dependents without relying on social welfare.<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0The applicant must have no criminal record.<\/li>\n<li>Sufficient knowledge of the German language.<\/li>\n<li>Knowledge of the German social order.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The issue at hand is whether an applicant for naturalization who obtained their residence permit through fraudulent misrepresentation meets the time requirements for naturalization. This question was addressed in the case initially by the Administrative Court, in the appeal process by the Higher Administrative Court, and finally in the revision process by the Federal Administrative Court.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-7773\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung.png\" alt=\"How can I become naturalised? Types of naturalisation. Discretionary naturalisation and eligibility for naturalisation\" width=\"739\" height=\"552\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung.png 739w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung-600x448.png 600w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung-250x187.png 250w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung-700x523.png 700w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arten-der-Einbuergerung-120x90.png 120w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 739px) 100vw, 739px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Note: This case was assessed according to the Nationality Act (StAG) before the 2024 amendments.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hintergrund_und_Einreise_des_Klagers\"><\/span>Background and Entry of the PlaintiffBackground and Entry of the Plaintiff<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The plaintiff, an Iraqi national, entered Germany in 1997 under a false identity. He claimed to be from central Iraq and applied for asylum. In a court proceeding, he was eventually granted refugee status and protection from deportation, as the court determined that he would face political persecution and degrading treatment if returned to Iraq. The court also ruled that, as a Kurd, the plaintiff could not be referred to northern Iraq as a safe alternative. These findings led to the granting of a residence permit in Germany.<\/p>\n<p>In March 2008, the plaintiff received a settlement permit under Section 26, Paragraph 4 of the Residence Act (AufenthG). Two years later, in May 2010, he presented an Iraqi nationality certificate to the immigration authorities and requested a correction of his personal information, which was granted. This revealed his true identity, which had remained unknown until that point.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Einburgerungsantrag_und_Ablehnung_durch_die_Behorde\"><\/span>Application for Naturalization and Rejection by the Authorities<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In October 2012, the applicant applied for naturalisation in Germany. In this application, he explained that he had lived in his birthplace in northern Iraq before leaving Iraq and had married there in 2000. At the request of the naturalisation authority, the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) stated in June 2013 that there were no prerequisites for revoking or withdrawing the benefits under asylum law. Despite this information, the competent authority rejected the applicant's application for naturalisation on 20 November 2013. The reason given was that the applicant did not meet the requirements for naturalisation in accordance with Section 10 of the German Citizenship Act (StAG). Specifically, he was accused of not having been legally resident in Germany for eight years due to the identity deception (at the time of the decision, eight years and not five years were still required for naturalisation).<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gerichtliche_Auseinandersetzungen_Klage_Berufung_und_Revision\"><\/span>Legal Disputes: Lawsuit, Appeal, and Revision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the decision in the Administrative Court, which was dismissed on January 14, 2015. He then appealed, which was also dismissed. The Higher Administrative Court confirmed the decision of the first instance in its ruling of April 20, 2016, stating that the plaintiff could not establish lawful residence in Germany before revealing his true identity in 2010. The court argued that the plaintiff\u2019s stay until that point was based on deception, and he could have been expelled at any time. Therefore, the period before 2010 could not be counted towards the required eight years. The plaintiff then filed a revision with the Federal Administrative Court.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Entscheidung_des_Bundesverwaltungsgerichts\"><\/span>Decision of the Federal Administrative Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Federal Administrative Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the revision was successful. The court determined that the plaintiff met the requirements for naturalization under Section 10 StAG, as he had lawfully resided in Germany for eight years. The assumption of the appeal court that the plaintiff could not establish lawful residence before disclosing his identity was found to be contrary to federal law.<\/p>\n<p>The court clarified that the current legal situation is decisive for assessing the naturalization claim. Under Section 10, Paragraph 1, Sentence 1 of the StAG, a foreigner who has lawfully resided in Germany for eight years must be naturalized upon application if they meet the other requirements and there is no reason for exclusion. The main question in this case was whether the plaintiff, despite the initial identity deception, had lawfully lived in Germany for eight years.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bewertung_des_gewohnlichen_Aufenthalts_und_der_Rechtmasigkeit\"><\/span>Assessment of Lawful Residence and Regular Stay<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Federal Administrative Court noted that the term \u201eregular residence\u201c in the Nationality Act is aligned with the legal definition in Section 30, Paragraph 3, Sentence 2 of the Social Code Book I (SGB I). A foreigner has a regular residence in Germany if they live there not just temporarily but for an indefinite period. The decisive factor is that their center of life is in Germany. This prognosis requires more than mere presence and does not exclude the possibility of temporary stay or the absence of measures by the immigration authorities to terminate the stay.<\/p>\n<p>According to the court, the plaintiff\u2019s stay before 2010, although based on deception, could still be considered regular residence. The mere vulnerability of a residence title obtained through deception does not preclude the recognition of regular residence. The court emphasized that it is crucial to consider how the immigration authorities would have hypothetically reacted if they had known about the deception. This hypothetical prognosis is meant to ensure that the plaintiff does not gain an unfair advantage from the deception.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Fazit_Rechtmasigkeit_und_Einburgerungsanspruch\"><\/span>Conclusion: Lawfulness and Entitlement to Naturalization<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Federal Administrative Court further concluded that the plaintiff also met the requirement of \u201elawfulness\u201c of his residence. This lawfulness refers to the possession of a valid residence title, which is considered lawful even if obtained through deception, as long as it has not been revoked or withdrawn. Since the plaintiff\u2019s settlement permit was granted in March 2008 and had not been revoked, his stay was lawful.<\/p>\n<p>The court emphasized that the outcome does not conflict with the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court, which holds that the revocation of fraudulently obtained naturalization is necessary to assert the law. It is not mandatory that every position obtained through deception must be reversed, as long as the effectiveness of the legal order is not undermined. Ultimately, the court ruled that the plaintiff met all the requirements for naturalization and therefore had a right to be naturalized.<\/p>\n<p>Source: Federal Administrative Court<\/p>\n<p><strong>Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/strong> Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.<\/p>\n<p>If you need legal advice, please feel free to call us at <strong>0221 - 80187670<\/strong> or send us an email to info@mth-partner.de<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/de\/koeln\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/\">Lawyers in Cologne advise and represent clients nationwide in immigration law.<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An applicant for naturalisation may also be entitled to discretionary naturalisation if they only received their previous residence permit because they misrepresented their identity. This was ruled by the Federal Administrative Court in a recent decision. <\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[3170,3169],"class_list":["post-5175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-auslaenderrecht-anwalt","tag-einbuergerung-trotz-falschangaben","tag-einbuergerung-trotz-luege"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Bleibt die Ausl\u00e4nderbeh\u00f6rde unt\u00e4tig, muss der Ausl\u00e4nder auch bei T\u00e4uschung eingeb\u00fcrgert werden.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Die Ein\u00fcrgerungsbeh\u00f6rde ist selbst dann zur Einb\u00fcrgerung verpflichtet, wenn der Ausl\u00e4nder seine Aufenthaltstitel durch Falschangaben erschlichen hat.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-if-the-immigration-authority-remains-inactive-the-foreigner-must-be-naturalized-even-in-cases-of-deception\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Bleibt die Ausl\u00e4nderbeh\u00f6rde unt\u00e4tig, muss der Ausl\u00e4nder auch bei T\u00e4uschung eingeb\u00fcrgert werden.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Die Ein\u00fcrgerungsbeh\u00f6rde ist selbst dann zur Einb\u00fcrgerung verpflichtet, wenn der Ausl\u00e4nder seine Aufenthaltstitel durch Falschangaben erschlichen hat.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-if-the-immigration-authority-remains-inactive-the-foreigner-must-be-naturalized-even-in-cases-of-deception\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-29T09:30:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-29T16:15:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Immigration Law: If the immigration authority remains inactive, the foreigner must be naturalized even in cases of deception.","description":"The naturalisation authority is obliged to grant naturalisation even if the foreigner has obtained their residence permit by providing false information.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-if-the-immigration-authority-remains-inactive-the-foreigner-must-be-naturalized-even-in-cases-of-deception\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Bleibt die Ausl\u00e4nderbeh\u00f6rde unt\u00e4tig, muss der Ausl\u00e4nder auch bei T\u00e4uschung eingeb\u00fcrgert werden.","og_description":"Die Ein\u00fcrgerungsbeh\u00f6rde ist selbst dann zur Einb\u00fcrgerung verpflichtet, wenn der Ausl\u00e4nder seine Aufenthaltstitel durch Falschangaben erschlichen hat.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-if-the-immigration-authority-remains-inactive-the-foreigner-must-be-naturalized-even-in-cases-of-deception\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2025-11-29T09:30:37+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-29T16:15:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Bleibt die Ausl\u00e4nderbeh\u00f6rde unt\u00e4tig, muss der Ausl\u00e4nder auch bei T\u00e4uschung eingeb\u00fcrgert werden.","datePublished":"2025-11-29T09:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-29T16:15:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/"},"wordCount":1171,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","keywords":["Einb\u00fcrgerung trotz Falschangaben","Einb\u00fcrgerung trotz L\u00fcge"],"articleSection":["Ausl\u00e4nderrecht"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/","name":"Immigration Law: If the immigration authority remains inactive, the foreigner must be naturalized even in cases of deception.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-29T09:30:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-29T16:15:33+00:00","description":"The naturalisation authority is obliged to grant naturalisation even if the foreigner has obtained their residence permit by providing false information.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-bleibt-die-auslaenderbehoerde-untaetig-muss-der-auslaender-auch-bei-taeuschung-eingebuergert-werden\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Bleibt die Ausl\u00e4nderbeh\u00f6rde unt\u00e4tig, muss der Ausl\u00e4nder auch bei T\u00e4uschung eingeb\u00fcrgert werden."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5175"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12558,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5175\/revisions\/12558"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}