{"id":5449,"date":"2019-05-27T10:36:57","date_gmt":"2019-05-27T10:36:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=5449"},"modified":"2026-01-02T07:07:47","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T07:07:47","slug":"auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/foreigners-law-the-deportation-of-a-misogynistic-sexual-offender-is-permissible-for-general-preventive-reasons\/","title":{"rendered":"Foreigners Law: The deportation of a misogynistic sexual offender is permissible for general preventive reasons."},"content":{"rendered":"

Higher Administrative Court of Rhineland-Palatinate, October 23, 2018, Case No.: 7 A 10866\/18 (Lower Court: Administrative Court Koblenz, June 18, 2018, Case No.: 3 K 26\/18.KO)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Deportation is an administrative act through which an immigration authority can terminate a residence permit and simultaneously impose a ban on issuing a new residence permit. This action makes the addressee obligated to leave the country. Deportation law is regulated in \u00a7\u00a7 53 ff. of the Residence Act (AufenthG), where, under the new law, a so-called deportation interest is required for deportation. According to \u00a7 52 (1) of the Residence Act, a foreigner whose stay endangers public safety and order, the liberal democratic basic order, or other significant interests of the Federal Republic of Germany must be deported if, after considering all circumstances of the individual case, the balance of interests in leaving the country versus remaining in the federal territory shows that the public interest in departure outweighs the interest in remaining. Thus, it is required that the so-called deportation interest (\u00a7 54 AufenthG) outweighs the so-called interest in remaining (\u00a7 55 AufenthG).<\/p>\n

\"Reasons<\/p>\n

A justification for deportation can be the general preventive consideration, which also corresponds to the apparent intention of the legislator according to \u00a7 53 of the Residence Act. According to \u00a7 53 (1) of the Residence Act, the danger does not have to emanate directly from the foreigner; it can also result from their presence. However, the deportation interest must still be current, meaning it must exist at the time of the court\u2019s decision.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Facts of the court case:<\/span><\/h2>\n

<\/span>Case Facts: The Plaintiff Was Convicted of Serious Sexual Abuse<\/span><\/h3>\n

The plaintiff in this case committed serious sexual abuse of a defenseless person in conjunction with exposure. As a result, he was deported by the defendant immigration authority. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against this deportation, but the Administrative Court of Koblenz confirmed the decision of the defendant immigration authority.<\/p>\n

<\/span>After the immigration authority deported him and the court confirmed this decision, the plaintiff appealed.<\/span><\/h3>\n

The plaintiff appealed against this decision before the Rhineland-Palatinate Higher Administrative Court.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Judgment of the Higher Administrative Court of Rhineland-Palatinate<\/span><\/h2>\n

The Higher Administrative Court of Rhineland-Palatinate ruled that the plaintiff\u2019s application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Administrative Court of Koblenz dated June 18, 2018, is rejected. The plaintiff\u2019s arguments did not justify granting the requested appeal. The reasons cited by the plaintiff for the appeal, including serious doubts (\u00a7 124 (2) No. 1 VwGO), special factual or legal difficulties (\u00a7 124 (2) No. 2 VwGO), and fundamental importance (\u00a7 124 (2) No. 3 VwGO), were not present.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Plaintiff Meets Criteria for Particularly Serious Deportation Interest<\/span><\/h3>\n

The Administrative Court rightly dismissed the lawsuit against the deportation of the plaintiff ordered on June 2, 2017, and his request for a residence permit. Due to the crime committed by the plaintiff on February 15, 2012 (serious sexual abuse of a defenseless person in conjunction with exposure), a particularly serious deportation interest was correctly assumed, which was not countered by an equivalent interest in remaining. Furthermore, the Administrative Court convincingly explained that, considering all individual circumstances, the interest in the plaintiff\u2019s deportation outweighs from a general preventive perspective.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff argued that the Administrative Court did not sufficiently consider his age at the time of the crime, the absence of a \u201ecriminal career,\u201c and his waiver of early release to undergo social therapy. However, the Administrative Court convincingly demonstrated that all the criteria cited by the plaintiff were considered (Judgment of the Regional Court of Mainz dated December 16, 2013 (3111 Js 4733\/12.jug \u2013 1 KLs \u2013)).<\/p>\n

<\/span>Deportation Justified by General Preventive Considerations<\/span><\/h3>\n

Even under the deportation law applicable since January 1, 2016, general preventive considerations can justify deportation (see BVerwG, Judgment of July 12, 2018 \u2013 1 C 16\/17 \u2013, juris, LS 1; Judgment of the Senate dated April 5, 2018 \u2013 7 A 11529\/17.OVG, juris, LS 1). When assessing whether the individual\u2019s stay endangers public safety and order, the liberal democratic basic order, or other significant interests of the Federal Republic of Germany, it is crucial that deportation is expected to have an adequate general preventive effect. This can be affirmed if it is expected that other foreigners will behave properly due to consistent deportation practices. Authorities and courts may assume that deportation ordered as a result of a criminal conviction is suitable for achieving this purpose. It is necessary that there are foreigners in similar situations to the individual in question who could be deterred from committing similar or identical criminal acts by the individual\u2019s deportation (see Judgment of the Senate dated April 5, 2018 \u2013 7 A 11529\/17.OVG \u2013, juris, para. 44, with further references).<\/p>\n

One can assume a danger to public safety and order even if a criminal foreigner does not pose a (repetition) danger, provided that the absence of an immigration response to their misconduct would fail to deter other foreigners from committing comparable offenses (see BVerwG, Judgment of July 12, 2018 \u2013 1 C 16\/17 \u2013, juris, para. 16). In this case, it was rightly assumed, due to the severity of the crimes and the motivation for them, that the plaintiff\u2019s deportation is suitable for deterring foreigners from cultural backgrounds that do not adhere to the principle of gender equality from committing crimes against sexual self-determination.<\/p>\n

It is the task of danger prevention law\u2014and thus of deportation law under the Residence Act\u2014to prevent a perspective that is not aligned with gender equality from leading foreigners who do not adhere to the values of the Basic Law to commit crimes against sexual self-determination. The particular brutality of the crime is evidenced by the findings in the final judgment of the Regional Court of Mainz dated December 16, 2013. For this reason, the plaintiff has a particularly serious deportation interest under \u00a7 54 (1) No. 1, 1a of the Residence Act, as he has already been sentenced to more than two years of imprisonment for this crime against sexual self-determination. Given the high rank of the legal interests violated by the crime on February 15, 2012\u2014physical integrity, life, and sexual self-determination\u2014and considering the extent and consequences of the violations of legal interests\u2014lifelong psychological and physical impairments of the victim\u2014no high requirements need to be placed on the assumption of a risk of repetition. However, the mere remote possibility of renewed violations of legal interests cannot justify a risk of repetition; instead, a risk of repetition must be seriously feared, even when high-ranking legal interests have been violated (see BVerwG, Judgment of October 4, 2012 \u2013 1 C 13.11 \u2013, juris, para. 18; Decision of the Senate dated March 14, 2017 \u2013 7 B 11061\/16.OVG \u2013 ESOVGRP, para. 11). In the plaintiff\u2019s case, significant factors indicate a risk of repetition.<\/p>\n

Thus, the plaintiff\u2019s deportation is necessary to prevent serious crimes by making it clear to many young men that the German state not only punishes crimes against sexual self-determination but also takes measures to terminate residence. Additionally, it demonstrates to the plaintiff\u2019s former clique that the state takes preventive measures to protect women, that one cannot approach this with a misogynistic attitude, and that crimes against sexual self-determination have not only criminal but also immigration law consequences. Conversely, the state\u2019s interest in protecting the right to sexual self-determination would be undermined if the plaintiff were allowed to remain in Germany despite the severe and long-lasting consequences of his crime for the victim.<\/p>\n

Source: Higher Administrative Court of Rhineland-Palatinate<\/p>\n

Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/strong>\u00a0Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.<\/p>\n

If you need legal advice, please feel free to call us at\u00a00221 - 80187670<\/strong>\u00a0or send us an e-mail to info@mth-partner.de<\/p>\n

Lawyers in Cologne advise and represent clients nationwide in immigration law.<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It is the concern of the state to protect the right to sexual self-determination. This protection would be impaired if the plaintiff were allowed to remain in Germany despite the serious and protracted consequences of his offence for the victim.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3666],"tags":[2314],"class_list":["post-5449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aufenthaltsbeendigung","tag-ausweisung-wegen-straftaten"],"yoast_head":"\nAusl\u00e4nderrecht: Ausweisung eines frauenverachtenden Triebt\u00e4ters aus generalpr\u00e4ventiven Gr\u00fcnden zul\u00e4ssig.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Um die Bev\u00f6lkerung vor Sexualstraft\u00e4tern zu sch\u00fctzen, ist die vorbeugende Ausweisung eines solchen zul\u00e4ssig.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/foreigners-law-the-deportation-of-a-misogynistic-sexual-offender-is-permissible-for-general-preventive-reasons\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Ausweisung eines frauenverachtenden Triebt\u00e4ters aus generalpr\u00e4ventiven Gr\u00fcnden zul\u00e4ssig.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Um die Bev\u00f6lkerung vor Sexualstraft\u00e4tern zu sch\u00fctzen, ist die vorbeugende Ausweisung eines solchen zul\u00e4ssig.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/foreigners-law-the-deportation-of-a-misogynistic-sexual-offender-is-permissible-for-general-preventive-reasons\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-27T10:36:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-02T07:07:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Foreigners Law: The deportation of a misogynistic sexual offender is permissible for general preventive reasons.","description":"In order to protect the population from sex offenders, the preventive expulsion of such offenders is permissible.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/foreigners-law-the-deportation-of-a-misogynistic-sexual-offender-is-permissible-for-general-preventive-reasons\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Ausweisung eines frauenverachtenden Triebt\u00e4ters aus generalpr\u00e4ventiven Gr\u00fcnden zul\u00e4ssig.","og_description":"Um die Bev\u00f6lkerung vor Sexualstraft\u00e4tern zu sch\u00fctzen, ist die vorbeugende Ausweisung eines solchen zul\u00e4ssig.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/foreigners-law-the-deportation-of-a-misogynistic-sexual-offender-is-permissible-for-general-preventive-reasons\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2019-05-27T10:36:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-02T07:07:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Ausweisung eines frauenverachtenden Triebt\u00e4ters aus generalpr\u00e4ventiven Gr\u00fcnden zul\u00e4ssig.","datePublished":"2019-05-27T10:36:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-02T07:07:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/"},"wordCount":1245,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","keywords":["Ausweisung wegen Straftaten"],"articleSection":["Aufenthaltsbeendigung"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/","name":"Foreigners Law: The deportation of a misogynistic sexual offender is permissible for general preventive reasons.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-27T10:36:57+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-02T07:07:47+00:00","description":"In order to protect the population from sex offenders, the preventive expulsion of such offenders is permissible.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-ausweisung-eines-frauenverachtenden-triebtaeters-aus-generalpraeventiven-gruenden-zulaessig\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Aufenthaltsbeendigung","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/aufenthaltsbeendigung\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Ausweisung eines frauenverachtenden Triebt\u00e4ters aus generalpr\u00e4ventiven Gr\u00fcnden zul\u00e4ssig."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5449"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5449\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12948,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5449\/revisions\/12948"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}