{"id":5596,"date":"2020-09-19T15:01:28","date_gmt":"2020-09-19T15:01:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=5596"},"modified":"2026-01-07T13:19:08","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T13:19:08","slug":"arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-does-the-failure-to-conduct-a-social-selection-process-render-the-dismissal-invalid\/","title":{"rendered":"Labor Law: Does the failure to conduct a social selection process render the dismissal invalid?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Labour Court of Cologne, 14.11.2019, Case No. 8 Ca 4564\/19<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>If a company is experiencing economic difficulties, certain departments may be spun off. This is particularly common when a company merges with or is otherwise taken over by another company. If such a merger results in mass redundancies, there is always the question of how the remaining jobs will be distributed. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-the-applicability-of-the-dismissal-protection-act-and-protection-against-dismissal-in-small-businesses\/\">Dismissal Protection Act<\/a> (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/receive-your-72-hour-emergency-plan\/\">KSchG<\/a>) contains a number of regulations on when a dismissal is invalid. According to Section 1 I KSchG, it must not be socially unjustified. From the company's point of view, however, only the best performing employees should be kept on. However, social justification is not primarily based on performance, but on criteria such as length of service, age, degree of disability, maintenance obligations (cf. Section 1 III KSchG). The company is therefore faced with the conflict of wanting to keep the top performers but also to continue to employ those in particular social need. However, the top performers will often not be among the most socially needy. In a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/services\/employment-and-labour-law\/\">Social selection<\/a> it would therefore have to dismiss many top performers. For this reason, the legislator has created the possibility in Section 1 III 2 KSchG to exclude the special service providers from the social selection. Nevertheless, the question arises as to which criteria can be used to exclude them.<\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"542\" class=\"size-full wp-image-7003 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende.png\" alt=\"What are the grounds for cancellation?\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende.png 724w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende-600x449.png 600w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende-250x187.png 250w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende-700x524.png 700w, https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/ordentliche-Kuendigungsgruende-120x90.png 120w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In the following ruling, the Cologne Labour Court clarified that a social selection process cannot be completely omitted and that decisions cannot be based solely on performance. Furthermore, any planned reallocation of tasks must precede a business-related dismissal. A company cannot issue a dismissal first and plan later. The decision to dismiss must be based on a task reallocation that makes the employee\u2019s role redundant, thereby justifying the dismissal.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hintergrund_des_Falles_Betriebsbedingte_Kundigung\"><\/span>The employer dismissed the employee for business-related reasons.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The present case concerns a dispute between an employee and her employer, who had a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-law-new-decision-on-dismissal-for-operational-reasons-due-to-restructuring-measures-outsourcing\/\">dismissal for operational reasons<\/a> had pronounced. The plaintiff had been employed by the defendant in Cologne since 1990. At the beginning of 2019, the employer informed her that the company would be taken over by another company and that most of the jobs in Cologne would be cut by the end of the year. A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/severance-pay-in-labour-law-what-you-are-really-entitled-to\/\">Social plan<\/a> and reconciliation of interests was drawn up with the General Works Council to regulate the handling of the redundancies.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the conclusion of the reconciliation of interests, the local <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labour-court-gelsenkirchen-termination-due-to-severe-disability-ineffective-helpful-for-employees-and-employers\/\">Works Council<\/a> the plaintiff's dismissal. The works council argued that a deadline stipulated in the reconciliation of interests had not been met. The employee finally lodged an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/receive-your-72-hour-emergency-plan\/\">Ruling of the Federal Labor Court<\/a>, to contest the validity of the cancellation.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Die_Argumente_der_Arbeitnehmerin\"><\/span>The employee's arguments<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The reconciliation of interests specified which parts of the business would remain open. It was determined that employment opportunities in other business areas would cease and that dismissals could be issued from a specific date. It also outlined the criteria for selecting employees for dismissal, including length of service, age, degree of disability, and dependents. The agreement also allowed for certain employees to be excluded from the social selection process under \u00a7 1 III 2 KSchG.<\/p>\n<p>The participation rights of the works councils were also regulated. However, the local (Cologne) Works Council did not sign the reconciliation of interests, and the agreement did not include a list of names as required by \u00a7 1 IV KSchG.<\/p>\n<p>In June 2019, the defendant informed the Works Council and employees about the planned dismissals. Additionally, the defendant initiated a consultation process with the General Works Council and the local Works Council. However, since the local Works Council could only meet on 28.06.19, the defendant suspended the process, claiming it had already concluded negotiations with the General Works Council. Nevertheless, on 19.06.2019, the local Works Council was formally consulted and given a list of employees to be dismissed and those to be retained. It was also noted that no social selection process had taken place between the employees selected for dismissal and those retained. The retained employees were chosen based on their special skills and qualifications. The plaintiff was among those dismissed.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Die_Position_der_Arbeitgeberin\"><\/span>The Works Council objected to the dismissal due to missed deadlines.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The local Works Council objected to the plaintiff\u2019s dismissal, arguing that the three-week deadline between informing the Works Council and issuing the dismissal, as outlined in the reconciliation of interests, had not been met. It also argued that there were opportunities for the plaintiff\u2019s continued employment.\n\nIn June 2019, the defendant notified the Federal Employment Agency of the mass layoffs due to the closure of the Cologne site, claiming the consultation process had been completed.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiff subsequently filed a dismissal protection lawsuit regarding the dismissal received on 27.06.2019.\n\nThe plaintiff argued that the dismissal was invalid due to being issued prematurely. The three-week period from informing the Works Council and the employees had not been adhered to. Additionally, the notification of mass layoffs to the Employment Agency was invalid, as the consultation process with the Works Council had not been completed, violating \u00a7 17 III 3 KSchG.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiff further argued that there was no valid business-related reason for the dismissal, as the need for her role would not cease on 31.12.19. At the very least, there were other positions within the company where she could be employed.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Urteil_des_Arbeitsgerichts_Koln\"><\/span>The employer did not conduct a social selection process.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Cologne Labour Court ruled in favour of the plaintiff and declared the dismissal invalid. The court found that the dismissal was not socially justified, as both the operational necessity of the dismissal and the proper social selection were lacking.<\/p>\n<p>The court emphasised that a dismissal for operational reasons is only permissible if the employment requirement for the dismissed employee no longer exists due to a business decision. The employer may not simply transfer the tasks of the dismissed employee to other employees without justifying this. A mere plan to reallocate tasks is not sufficient to justify a dismissal. In this case, however, the employer was unable to present any concrete measures for the reallocation of tasks. This indicated that the business decision to close the department was only concretised after the dismissal. However, such a \"provisional dismissal\" was inadmissible.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Fehlende_Sozialauswahl_als_weiteres_Kundigungshindernis\"><\/span>Lack of social selection as a further obstacle to dismissal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The court also ruled that the dismissal was invalid as no proper social selection had been carried out. The employer should have carried out a social selection between the dismissed employees and those who continued to be employed. This was also necessary if the continued employment was only temporary. However, the employer had decided solely on the basis of performance criteria and had disregarded the social aspects as stipulated in the KSchG.<\/p>\n<p>It is true that the law stipulates that particular service providers may be excluded from the social selection. However, this only applies in exceptional cases. The employer was not able to sufficiently explain why the employees who were to be kept on should be considered to be high performers. A generalised assertion that they had special skills and knowledge was not sufficient to deviate from the legal requirements. The court also pointed out that the documentation submitted by the employer for social selection was inadequate.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Schlussfolgerung_Unwirksamkeit_der_Kundigung\"><\/span>Conclusion: Invalidity of the cancellation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>In summary, the court ruled that the dismissal was socially unjustified and therefore invalid. The employer had neither proven that the dismissal was necessary for operational reasons nor had it carried out a proper social selection. Furthermore, the court found that the requirements for a reduced social selection pursuant to Section 1 (5) KSchG were not met, as the reconciliation of interests did not contain a list of names of the employees to be dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>The judgement of the Cologne Labour Court emphasises the importance of a careful examination of the social criteria and proper justification of operational necessity in the case of dismissals for operational reasons. If these requirements are not met, as in this case, the dismissal is invalid.<\/p>\n<p>Source: Employment Court Cologne<\/p>\n<p><strong>Important Note: The content of this article has been prepared to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, due to the complexity and constant evolution of the subject matter, we must exclude liability and warranty.<\/strong> Important Notice: The content of this article has been created to the best of our knowledge and understanding. However, due to the complexity and constant changes in the subject matter, we must exclude any liability and warranty.<\/p>\n<p>If you need legal advice, please feel free to call us at <strong>0221 - 80187670<\/strong> or send us an email at or send an email to info@mth-partner.de <strong>info@mth-partner.de<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"gtx-trans\" style=\"position: absolute; left: 571px; top: 1080.52px;\">\n<div class=\"gtx-trans-icon\"><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the opinion of the court, it should have carried out a social selection with regard to the employees who continued to be employed. This also applies if they are only employed for a short period of time.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11618,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3629],"tags":[319,1131],"class_list":["post-5596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kuendigungsschutzklage","tag-anwendbarkeit-des-kundigungsschutzgesetzes","tag-kundigung-als-billigenswert-und-angemessen"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Arbeitsrecht: F\u00fchrt das Unterlassen einer Sozialauswahl zur Unwirksamkeit der K\u00fcndigung? - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bei der betriebsbedingten K\u00fcndigung eines Arbeitnehmers muss der Arbeitgeber die Sozialauswahl beachten. Das heisst, dass der Arbeitgeber pr\u00fcfen muss, welcher Arbeitnehmer in Frage kommt.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-does-the-failure-to-conduct-a-social-selection-process-render-the-dismissal-invalid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arbeitsrecht: F\u00fchrt das Unterlassen einer Sozialauswahl zur Unwirksamkeit der K\u00fcndigung? - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bei der betriebsbedingten K\u00fcndigung eines Arbeitnehmers muss der Arbeitgeber die Sozialauswahl beachten. Das heisst, dass der Arbeitgeber pr\u00fcfen muss, welcher Arbeitnehmer in Frage kommt.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-does-the-failure-to-conduct-a-social-selection-process-render-the-dismissal-invalid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-19T15:01:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-07T13:19:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Labour law: Does the omission of a social selection lead to the invalidity of the dismissal? - Law firm Tieben","description":"When dismissing an employee for operational reasons, the employer must take social selection into account. This means that the employer must check which employee is eligible for redundancy.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-does-the-failure-to-conduct-a-social-selection-process-render-the-dismissal-invalid\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arbeitsrecht: F\u00fchrt das Unterlassen einer Sozialauswahl zur Unwirksamkeit der K\u00fcndigung? - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","og_description":"Bei der betriebsbedingten K\u00fcndigung eines Arbeitnehmers muss der Arbeitgeber die Sozialauswahl beachten. Das heisst, dass der Arbeitgeber pr\u00fcfen muss, welcher Arbeitnehmer in Frage kommt.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/labor-law-does-the-failure-to-conduct-a-social-selection-process-render-the-dismissal-invalid\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2020-09-19T15:01:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-07T13:19:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Arbeitsrecht: F\u00fchrt das Unterlassen einer Sozialauswahl zur Unwirksamkeit der K\u00fcndigung?","datePublished":"2020-09-19T15:01:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-07T13:19:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/"},"wordCount":1326,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg","keywords":["Anwendbarkeit des K\u00fcndigungsschutzgesetzes","K\u00fcndigung als billigenswert und angemessen"],"articleSection":["K\u00fcndigungsschutzklage"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/","name":"Labour law: Does the omission of a social selection lead to the invalidity of the dismissal? - Law firm Tieben","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg","datePublished":"2020-09-19T15:01:28+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-07T13:19:08+00:00","description":"When dismissing an employee for operational reasons, the employer must take social selection into account. This means that the employer must check which employee is eligible for redundancy.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Arbeitsrecht.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Arbeitsrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/arbeitsrecht-fuehrt-das-unterlassen-einer-sozialauswahl-zur-unwirksamkeit-der-kuendigung\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arbeitsrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"K\u00fcndigungen &amp; k\u00fcndigungsschutz","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/kuendigungen-kuendigungsschutz\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"K\u00fcndigungsschutzklage","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/arbeitsrecht-rechtsanwalt\/kuendigungen-kuendigungsschutz\/kuendigungsschutzklage\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":5,"name":"Arbeitsrecht: F\u00fchrt das Unterlassen einer Sozialauswahl zur Unwirksamkeit der K\u00fcndigung?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5596"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5596\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12998,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5596\/revisions\/12998"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11618"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}