{"id":6819,"date":"2023-04-10T08:32:42","date_gmt":"2023-04-10T08:32:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?p=6819"},"modified":"2025-12-19T10:38:28","modified_gmt":"2025-12-19T10:38:28","slug":"auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-on-the-credit-of-tolerated-stay-periods-for-the-issuance-of-a-permanent-residence-permit-under-26-4-aufenthg\/","title":{"rendered":"Immigration Law: On the Credit of Tolerated Stay Periods for the Issuance of a Permanent Residence Permit under \u00a7 26 (4) AufenthG"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hamburg Administrative Court, judgment of December 2, 2022, Ref. No.: 5 K 4511\/21<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The period of stay of the applicant in Germany required for the granting of a settlement permit pursuant to Section 26 Paragraph 4 Sentence 4 in conjunction with Section 35 Paragraph 1 Sentence 2 of the Residence Act shall, within the meaning of Section 26 Paragraph 4 Sentence 3 of the Residence Act, be credited with the time during which the applicant is already staying in the Federal territory during the asylum procedure.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In the present case, the plaintiff, born in 1998, who had already entered Germany in 2015 and applied for asylum, but was only granted a residence permit in 2018, had applied for a settlement permit. The competent authority rejected the application and did not resolve the plaintiff's objection. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit with the Hamburg Administrative Court on October 27, 2021.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>Facts of the legal proceedings<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h2>\n

<\/span>The Afghan plaintiff had unsuccessfully applied for a permanent residence permit (settlement permit).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n

The plaintiff, born in Afghanistan in 1998, entered the Federal Republic of Germany in 2015 and filed an asylum application on July 16, 2015. After a deportation ban under Section 60 (5) of the Residence Act for persons from Afghanistan was established on September 5, 2018, the plaintiff received a residence permit under Section 25 (3) of the Residence Act on September 28, 2018. In September 2019, he began training as an automotive mechatronics technician, which he had not yet completed at the time of his application for a settlement permit.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>Immigration authorities considered residence periods and insurance contributions as not fulfilled<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n

The plaintiff does not meet the requirements for the granting of a settlement permit pursuant to Section 26 (4) in conjunction with Section 9 (2) of the Residence Act, as he cannot prove that he has paid at least 60 contributions to the statutory pension insurance scheme.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

He still does not meet the requirements for the granting of a settlement permit pursuant to Section 26 (4) in conjunction with Section 35 (1) Sentence 2 of the Residence Act. Due to the reference in Section 26 (4) Sentence 4 of the Residence Act, a residence permit for humanitarian reasons, such as the plaintiff's, can also be considered a residence permit within the meaning of Section 35 (1) Sentence 2 No. 1 of the Residence Act, but this must have existed before the applicant reached the age of majority. The applicant may only be of legal age at the end of the five-year period, but not at the time the residence permit is granted. The permitted periods of residence during the ongoing asylum procedure, at the start of which the plaintiff was still a minor, are not to be taken into account. This follows from the systematic positioning of the sentences within Section 26 (4) of the Residence Act. The crediting of the periods of permission is regulated in sentence 3, while the reference to Section 35 only appears in sentence 4. This means that the crediting applies only to the cases referred to in sentences 1 and 2, but not to cases of referral. The Federal Administrative Court also follows this view in its case law (BVerwG, judgment of September 13, 2011, 1 C 17\/10).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The plaintiff argued that the tolerated periods under \u00a7 55 (3) AsylG during the ongoing asylum procedure since 2015 should be credited towards the residence requirement, thereby fulfilling the requirement of \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 2 no. 1 AufenthG.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Decision of the Administrative Court of Hamburg<\/span><\/h2>\n

The court partially upheld the claim, overturning the rejection decision as formulated in the objection decision of October 5, 2021, and obliging the authority to make a new decision on the plaintiff\u2019s application, exercising its discretion properly. There is no fixed claim under \u00a7 26 (4) in conjunction with \u00a7 9 (2) AufenthG or under \u00a7 26 (4) in conjunction with \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 1 AufenthG, but the plaintiff is entitled to a new decision under proper discretion according to \u00a7 26 (4) in conjunction with \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 2 AufenthG.<\/p>\n

The court agreed with the authority\u2019s view that the plaintiff did not have a claim for a permanent residence permit under \u00a7 26 (4) in conjunction with \u00a7 9 (2) AufenthG due to insufficient pension insurance contributions.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Court\u2019s Consideration<\/span><\/h3>\n

The court found that the plaintiff met the requirements of \u00a7 26 (4) sentence 4 in conjunction with \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 2 AufenthG. Specifically, the tolerated periods during the ongoing asylum procedure should be credited towards the residence requirement, thus establishing the legal basis for the residence permit before the plaintiff reached adulthood.<\/p>\n

The court reached this decision based on systematic considerations. The reference was not placed in sentence 4, after the crediting of tolerated periods, because it does not apply to those cases. Rather, this arrangement was made to clarify that the crediting applies not only to the cases of the reference but also to those regulated in sentences 1 and 2. If the legislator had intended for the crediting of tolerated periods not to be possible in the cases of the reference to \u00a7 35, it would have been placed in a different paragraph.<\/p>\n

The crediting of tolerated periods is also historically justified. The purpose of the regulation is to enable minors who enter with a humanitarian residence permit to solidify their stay in the form of a permanent residence permit under the same conditions as children with a residence permit for family reasons, as stated in the explanatory notes of \u00a7 26 (4) AufenthG (BT-Dr 15\/420, p. 80). Minors to whom \u00a7 35 AufenthG is directly applicable usually receive a residence permit under \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 2 no. 1 immediately upon entering Germany, so they never face the situation of entering as minors but receiving a residence permit only upon reaching adulthood. To ensure equal treatment for minors with a humanitarian residence permit, it is therefore essential to credit the tolerated periods during the asylum procedure.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Credit of Tolerated Periods from Historical and Teleological Perspectives<\/span><\/h3>\n

Finally, the crediting of tolerated periods is necessary from teleological perspectives. The reference in \u00a7 26 (4) sentence 4 AufenthG would effectively be rendered meaningless if such crediting did not occur. Minors with a humanitarian residence permit generally enter Germany without a residence permit and receive it only with a delay, thus always being disadvantaged. The plaintiff\u2019s case does not represent an atypical situation in this respect. The disadvantage should be specifically addressed by the reference.<\/p>\n

The defendant\u2019s argument that this view contradicts the case law of the Federal Administrative Court is not accurate. In the aforementioned BVerwG ruling, the plaintiff lacked the requirement of \u00a7 35 (1) sentence 2 no. 1 AufenthG because he did not have a residence permit before reaching the age of majority. Instead, the issue was the continuity of at least tolerated residence in Germany. After the asylum procedure, the plaintiff was only temporarily tolerated in Germany. This aspect is the basis of the BVerwG\u2019s decision. However, this does not apply to the case at hand, where the issuance of the plaintiff\u2019s residence permit followed immediately after the tolerated stay during the asylum procedure.<\/p>\n

The remaining requirements for granting a settlement permit were met, which is why the court ordered the defendant to reconsider the application at its discretion. In this regard, the court stated that this discretion must be exercised in accordance with the purpose of the authorization as outlined above. The plaintiff \"overfulfills\" the factual requirements of the authorization provision that allow for discretion, and in particular, the aspects in his favour must be taken into account.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Source: VG Hamburg<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Important note:<\/span><\/span><\/strong> \u00a0The content of this article has been compiled to the best of our knowledge and belief. However, the complexity and constant change of the subject matter necessitate the exclusion of liability and warranty.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

If you need legal advice, please call us without obligation on\u00a0 <\/span><\/span>0221 - 80187670<\/span><\/span><\/strong> \u00a0or send us an email to\u00a0 <\/span><\/span>info@mth-partner.de<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Lawyer in Cologne advises and represents clients nationwide in immigration law<\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Find out more about the case of an Afghan plaintiff who successfully appealed to the Hamburg Administrative Court to obtain a new decision on his application despite having been refused a settlement permit. The judgement sheds light on the recognition of periods of residence during the asylum procedure and the legal requirements for the granting of a settlement permit in Germany.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":11619,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3663],"tags":[1839],"class_list":["post-6819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-niederlassungserlaubnis","tag-voraussetzung-niederlassungserlaubnis"],"yoast_head":"\nAusl\u00e4nderrecht: Zur Anrechnung der Gestattungszeiten bei Erteilung der Niederlassungserlaubnis nach \u00a7 26 Abs. 4 AufenthG - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Das Urteil beleuchtet die Anrechnung von Aufenthaltszeiten w\u00e4hrend des Asylverfahrens und die Voraussetzungen der Niederlassungserlaubnis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-on-the-credit-of-tolerated-stay-periods-for-the-issuance-of-a-permanent-residence-permit-under-26-4-aufenthg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Zur Anrechnung der Gestattungszeiten bei Erteilung der Niederlassungserlaubnis nach \u00a7 26 Abs. 4 AufenthG - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Das Urteil beleuchtet die Anrechnung von Aufenthaltszeiten w\u00e4hrend des Asylverfahrens und die Voraussetzungen der Niederlassungserlaubnis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-on-the-credit-of-tolerated-stay-periods-for-the-issuance-of-a-permanent-residence-permit-under-26-4-aufenthg\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-04-10T08:32:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-19T10:38:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mth_Tieben\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"helmer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Aliens law: On the crediting of authorisation periods when granting a settlement permit pursuant to Section 26 (4) AufenthG - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Tieben","description":"The judgement sheds light on the recognition of periods of residence during the asylum procedure and the requirements for a settlement permit","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-on-the-credit-of-tolerated-stay-periods-for-the-issuance-of-a-permanent-residence-permit-under-26-4-aufenthg\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Zur Anrechnung der Gestattungszeiten bei Erteilung der Niederlassungserlaubnis nach \u00a7 26 Abs. 4 AufenthG - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","og_description":"Das Urteil beleuchtet die Anrechnung von Aufenthaltszeiten w\u00e4hrend des Asylverfahrens und die Voraussetzungen der Niederlassungserlaubnis","og_url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/immigration-law-on-the-credit-of-tolerated-stay-periods-for-the-issuance-of-a-permanent-residence-permit-under-26-4-aufenthg\/","og_site_name":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","article_published_time":"2023-04-10T08:32:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-19T10:38:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":600,"url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"helmer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_site":"@mth_Tieben","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"helmer","Estimated reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/"},"author":{"name":"helmer","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3"},"headline":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Zur Anrechnung der Gestattungszeiten bei Erteilung der Niederlassungserlaubnis nach \u00a7 26 Abs. 4 AufenthG","datePublished":"2023-04-10T08:32:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-19T10:38:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/"},"wordCount":1306,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","keywords":["Voraussetzung Niederlassungserlaubnis"],"articleSection":["Niederlassungserlaubnis"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/","name":"Aliens law: On the crediting of authorisation periods when granting a settlement permit pursuant to Section 26 (4) AufenthG - Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Tieben","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","datePublished":"2023-04-10T08:32:42+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-19T10:38:28+00:00","description":"The judgement sheds light on the recognition of periods of residence during the asylum procedure and the requirements for a settlement permit","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/Auslanderrecht.jpg","width":1200,"height":600,"caption":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/auslaenderrecht-zur-anrechnung-der-gestattungszeiten-bei-erteilung-der-niederlassungserlaubnis-nach-26-abs-4-aufenthg\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Niederlassungserlaubnis","item":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/category\/auslaenderrecht-anwalt\/niederlassungserlaubnis\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Ausl\u00e4nderrecht: Zur Anrechnung der Gestattungszeiten bei Erteilung der Niederlassungserlaubnis nach \u00a7 26 Abs. 4 AufenthG"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","name":"Law firm Tieben","description":"Lawyer Tieben \/ Law firm Cologne","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#organization","name":"Law firm Tieben","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/logo.png","width":254,"height":52,"caption":"Rechtsanwaltskanzlei\u00a0Tieben"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100054481000178","https:\/\/x.com\/mth_Tieben","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/helmer-tieben-09570226"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/#\/schema\/person\/fbcf627706a8a6151cec2217af8c74b3","name":"helmer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f3308295754604f18007cf9e14e5984d1b864d3edea19e3681ff8c9354cd73e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"helmer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6819"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12798,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6819\/revisions\/12798"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mth-partner.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}